Not everything is truly circular!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the growing discourse on sustainable design and circular economy, one mantra is often cited as inherently circular: \u201cDo more with less.\u201d<\/em> While appealing in its simplicity and apparent efficiency, this principle has been misapplied as a pillar of circular design. In reality, \u00ab\u00a0do more with less\u00a0\u00bb is a linear design principle\u2014and has been for decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The problem lies in its scope. \u00ab\u00a0Do more with less\u00a0\u00bb typically focuses on optimizing the production phase<\/strong>\u2014reducing inputs, simplifying materials, and minimizing immediate costs or weight. But circular design demands a holistic, lifecycle-oriented<\/strong> approach: one that integrates production, use<\/strong>, and end-of-use<\/strong> considerations. Ignoring these later phases leads to trade-offs that can undermine sustainability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Take for example the substitution of recyclable steel parts with lightweight glass fiber-reinforced high-temperature plastics. Yes, the new design uses less material and reduces weight, aligning with \u00ab\u00a0do more with less.\u00a0\u00bb But these plastics are not recyclable<\/strong>, locking the product into a linear end-of-life<\/strong> pathway and compromising long-term circularity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Or consider architecture: designing a building to be expandable in the future may require a stronger initial structure<\/strong>, thus more material upfront. This seems inefficient at first glance. But by allowing for adaptation and reuse<\/strong> over time, the design supports circularity\u2014offering longevity, flexibility, and reduced need for demolition and new construction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another case: disassemblable products. These may be heavier<\/strong> or more complex than minimally designed counterparts, but their ability to be repaired, upgraded, or recycled<\/strong> places them squarely in the realm of circular thinking. Here, adding complexity serves the cycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The key message: not everything efficient is circular<\/strong>. We must resist conflating minimal design with sustainable design. Efficiency at one stage of a product\u2019s life does not ensure sustainability across its full lifecycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n True circular design starts<\/strong> with a question often neglected in linear frameworks: Do we need this at all?<\/em> This is the core of the refuse<\/strong> principle\u2014the most powerful and overlooked \u00ab\u00a0R\u00a0\u00bb in the circular economy. The best material is the one you don’t use. Efficiency without necessity is still waste.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For circularity to be meaningful, we must commit to clearer, more precise communication<\/strong>. Designers, engineers, and policymakers need to evaluate design principles against the entire lifecycle<\/strong>. Let\u2019s stop labeling every efficiency-driven design as circular and instead focus on strategies that genuinely close the loop<\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Not everything is truly circular! In the growing discourse on sustainable design and circular economy, one mantra is often cited as inherently circular: \u201cDo more with less.\u201d While appealing in its simplicity and apparent efficiency, this principle has been misapplied as a pillar of circular design. In reality, \u00ab\u00a0do more with less\u00a0\u00bb is a linear design principle\u2014and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3379,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"off","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[82],"class_list":["post-3383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-circular-blog","tag-circular-economy-fr"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3383"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3386,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3383\/revisions\/3386"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/positiveimpakt.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}